Someone was quoted in my blog entry yesterday as saying that the English language is stupid due to its apparent inconsistencies. But that is precisely why it is such a fun language! Even the native speakers make mistakes but a lot of bloopers may be avoided if, once we become aware of our "sins" of commission or omission, we make the effort to not repeat them. I hold newsmakers, news readers, fellow journalists and advertising copywriters to a higher standard.
* Just today in Parliament, an MP kept saying "tue-tion" for "tue-ee-tion" (tuition).
* Years ago, one minister famously pronounced condominium as "condom-minium" and since then, almost everyone else seems to have followed suit (it should be "condo-minium" ).
* I never fail to be amused when someone utters "masterbed room" instead of "master bedroom" (try it... it'll sound like "masterbate room").
* I do not understand why the morning news readers at 93.8FM, in reporting the road traffic situation, must start off with "We have a traffic accident..." Who cares! Please report THE situations that the public wants to know, for example, "There is a traffic accident...".
* But, happily, I now hear on air fewer such redundancies as "12 noon" and "12 midnight".
I have a collection of printed stuff that should not have been allowed. Jargon like "take it to a new/higher/next level" (which level?) or "going forward" (so? there was an option to go backwards?) keep popping up:
Old-time journalists like me would never have allowed "daylight robbery" or "broad daylight"!...
Someone needs to seriously explain to me what are "thought leaders" because it begs the question: what do you label those who are "benefiting" from the thoughtful pearls of wisdom being cast down:
It is all right to say existing laws, buildings, COE quotas, etc, because these can be made non-existent ie expunged, demolished, or altered. But you can't apply it as an adjective to people:
If these bondholders cease to exist, I doubt if they would care two hoots about getting any information updates! In this example above, existing is a redundancy and should have been excised.
Meanwhile, what the headline writer means here are "current owners"...
_______________________________________________
The advertisements we are bombarded with are full of claims that play on impressive sounding words:
You can waterproof something but how exactly do you future-proof your organisation?...
...or the drainage network!
_______________________________________________________
If you managed to get through to the end of this laundry list, you'll probably be exhaustipated. That's the (made-up) word of the day:
No comments:
Post a Comment