Yes, it is proper journalistic practice to use the labels "con man" or "con artist" as shorthand for confidence trickster or scammer. It is also okay to say "conned" (someone was conned; he conned someone; a businessman admitted to having conned)...
But "conning" (as used in this context)?...
Even the well-regarded Washington Post has its slip-ups. "10,000 extra forces"?...
___________________________________________________
No comments:
Post a Comment