Saturday, May 4, 2013

Buildings: Telling (selling) tall stories...

This was the top story in ST and TODAY (May 4):




My own (not so serious) headline for the story would have been:

PAP's AIM is clear

-------------------------------------------------------

You get what you ask for 

Ask a famous car design firm to design a building...


... and you get this:


Meanwhile, newspaper editors always say they want the "hard news", and they tell reporters to "get to the point". In Beijing, China, one government-owned newspaper has taken it all to a new height (see insing.com story below):



Chinese paper mocked over penis-shaped building


http://news.insing.com/tabloid/chinese-paper-mocked-penis-shaped-building/id-f6733f00

------------------------------------------------------------

Back in Singapore, it's literalitis at work in this condo ad: If you can call a building a skyscraper, then surely it must be "scraping" the sky!...


On the other hand, while other developers scream superlatives, this one below seems almost embarrassed that its project is in a posh district and has decided to go with an understated pitch that actually says nothing and -- if you think about it -- can be be used for any location, posh or otherwise:


Finally, "rare" is in vogue, even if used inaccurately, as in these examples...




No comments:

Post a Comment